You are browsing the archive for racism.

Avatar of Peachy

by Peachy

Red + Blue = Purple

August 4, 2010 in Opinions, Philosophy, Political, racism, This and That

(Originally published on Aug. 4, 2010)

What a marvelous life! Had lunch today with a beautiful, intellectual, warm and honest woman. Our conversation was exhilarating, and joyful.

Makes me wonder why many say “it’s the little thing in life that count.” Our conversation today might be one of those “little things” that people refer to, but I find these events to be magnificent. Not little things at all.

But, not to bore you with my silly giddiness anymore, I’ll get right to the purpose of my rambling tonight. During the course of our conversation, many things came up and one had to do with people’s seemingly inability to find common ground. When did we slide into such a state of division? When did we forget the unique and complex qualities that each human possesses? When did we decide that to affiliate meant to check independent brain cells at the door, and follow thought and logic of the numbers?

I’m particularly fascinated at the ease in which someone can adhere to a doctrine that attributes a strict criteria, with no wiggle room, to any particular affiliation. In other words, I’ve observed that we’ve figuratively and literally entered a culture of black and white where gray does not exist. I’ll bet many parents would be hard pressed to see the many beautiful talents of their children in this harsh b/w way, yet so many kids are being primed to carry these views into adulthood, anyway. Sad.

To the title…when the subject of finding common ground came up, the notion of mixing colors together was discussed as an analogy to the current political gridlock.

Why can’t we say – you like red, and I like blue, but I’ll bet we can mix them together and make purple, which we both like.?


Share
Avatar of Peachy

by Peachy

Have You Noticed: When Words are Used, they Become Useless.

July 17, 2010 in American English, Dialect, language, Opinions, racism

Words have been on my mind lately. I’ve noticed, and wonder if anyone else has noticed how words lose their original usefulness after they’ve been used a gazillion times.

Take for instance, “racism.” The definition is:”
1.a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one’s own race is superior and has the right to rule others.

2.a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.

3.hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

But, if you talk to someone perceived to be racist, they will almost always tell you they have “black” friends, and have even gone out in public with them; therefore, they are not racist. And they will also tell you Blacks are genetically better equipped for sports, ignoring that they also have smart and hard working genes. It’s become a convenience to change the actual definition of racism to an act of discrimination that’s clearly against the law and to take a leap to only the act itself qualifies for a racist definition. Read the definition above again, if you will…and note what the word really means, and how we’ve moved from that position to the current manufactured definition.

Stereotyping is another one of those words: Definition:
1.a process, now often replaced by more advanced methods, for making metal printing plates by taking a mold of composed type or the like in papier-mâché or other material and then taking from this mold a cast in type metal.
2.a plate made by this process.
3.a set form; convention.
4.Sociology . a simplified and standardized conception or image invested with special meaning and held in common by members of a group: The cowboy and Indian are American stereotypes.
–verb (used with object)
5.to make a stereotype of.
6.to characterize or regard as a stereotype: The actor has been stereotyped as a villain.
7.to give a fixed form to.

As it is used now, stereotyping is an activity that smacks of racial overtones. It therefore becomes easy to say that one does not stereotype because it is now viewed mostly as a racist activity which racists do not participate in.

These are just a couple, and I wonder if anyone knows of more…profiling, for instance.


Share
        Friends were surprised, indeed, when Frank and Jennifer broke their
engagement, but Frank had a ready explanation: "Would you marry someone who
was habitually unfaithful, who lied at every turn, who was selfish and lazy
and sarcastic?"
        "Of course not," said a sympathetic friend.
        "Well," retorted Frank, "neither would Jennifer."
2 visitors online now
1 guests, 1 members
Max visitors today: 10 at 08:23 am EDT
This month: 30 at 05-19-2012 03:55 am EDT
This year: 30 at 05-19-2012 03:55 am EDT
All time: 107 at 01-31-2011 07:26 pm EST