You are browsing the archive for Opinions.

Avatar of Peachy

by Peachy

On Getting Very Very Old

January 2, 2011 in feet don't fail me, Geriatric, Getting old, Opinions

I sincerely hope my rambling thoughts on this subject doesn’t upset any of those who choose to read it, but I’m quickly approaching the time in my life when this subject has real meaning, and am thankful I still have thoughts that can be thrown together into complete sentences. Besides, I’m tired of staring at my belly button, and want to get the last pompous observations out of my brain before I don’t care any more.

Getting very old is not fun, and it’s not cracked up to be what we’ve been trying to convince ourselves all our lives. The best we can hope for is that when our feet don’t run “no mo”, our minds will still produce something, hopefully, better and not worse than when our feet could run. When I approached 50 I kept hearing the new “30″ is now “50.” Then I heard the new “40″ is now “60,” and now that I’m finally getting to that magical of age 70, I’m hearing the new “50″ is now “70.” I have simply one word response to this: Bullshit.

I suppose the sentiments are meant to “cheer” one up, make one feel not so bad bout getting so old. I think this is a shame. It’s sure as hell a lot better getting to 70 than not getting there, so all of those who made it this far should rejoice.

Furthermore, I was thinking back to my own grandparents, parents, and what getting old for them was like. It was like, uh, getting old! I don’t recall hearing any of the older folks complain about their waists, wrinkles, lack of hair, or anything cosmetic. Plastic Surgeons would have been hard pressed to make any money back in those days. My ancestors were happy old people..there was no “role” models for each passing milestone. It just happened.

There’s always a trigger that starts me to thinking about these things, and in this case it was a friend who is quickly approaching 70. He shared with us an article, which I’d like to share with you here: (note: don’t know why my links aren’t showing up as clickable…you’ll have to copy and paste this into your URL)

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/31/opinion/31jacoby.html?_r=1&pagewanted=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha212


Share
Avatar of Peachy

by Peachy

Sympathetic Look at the South’s Part in the Civil War

January 1, 2011 in Civil War, Opinions, Philosophy, Political, robber barons, This and That, Uncategorized

Foreward:

Especially to all my liberal and progressive friends, I am asking your understanding of my special feelings toward the south, and ask that you also look objectively at a very emotional and human aspect of the southerner’s plight in the Civil War. Thank you.

I watched the Rose Parade today, and as always was thrilled to see the amazing creations made from flowers. The artists who put this together are just too incredible for my words for I cannot begin to imagine myself being able to do this! So, Rose Parade Float makers..Thank you every year for this wonderful treat!

There are paraders other than the floats in the Rose Parade though. Marching bands from various high schools, among others…splendid troops on horse back. I was sitting comfortably enjoying it all when a group of infantry men in the traditional blue and gold of the Union Army marched by on horseback. The commentator made the obligatory comments, mentioning how much the Union soldiers suffered in the Civil War. I thought for sure that what would follow would be a group of Confederate soldiers, but they never marched by. When I realized there would be none, I got a twinge of pain for those young Confederate soldiers.

Let me explain why. I firmly belief the Civil War was about slavery, but as in almost all wars, the conflict was started by people much more powerful than the ordinary citizen. Confederate soldiers for the most part did not own slaves, so this would not have been an issue for them. Actually, only about 6% of wealthy southerners owned slaves, and Lincoln’s proposition to forbid expansion of slavery was definitely an economic issue for these landowners. That would mean slave owners could not transfer slaves to states that had abolished slavery, therefore, rendering profits less substantial than they would be with slaves.

The young soldier who fought on the Confederate side seemed to be of the belief that the war was being fought for states’ rights, and not slavery. The southern rich cleverly masked the real reasons for this horrible war in the same way they manipulated poor whites to believe that blacks were inferior in order to prevent white uprising against the wealthy masters. ”

“By and large, owning slaves was the privilege of the well-to-do. The rank and file of the Southern armies was composed of farmers and laborers who volunteered to protect home and everything dear from Northern invaders, to keep their traditions and be left alone.”

To preserve those traditions, they paid a severe price: Confederate soldiers suffered up to 12 percent killed versus 5 percent of the Union Army. Killed in action totalled 74,542 plus another 59,297 dead from disease (this figure is generally considered underestimated). Of the 214,000 Confederates imprisoned in the North, 26,000 (12 percent) died.” This as written in the article at the link shown below.

I do not think a celebration of the Confederacy is in order for two reasons: 1. The Confederate states were attempting to pull apart a United States that had promise of becoming great; and, 2. The overall reason for the war was slavery, regardless of what the poor confederate soldier and his family thought.

I do think the Confederate soldier should at least be honored. Not the war, but the individuals.

http://vaudc.org/confed_vets.html



Share
From a certain point onward there is no longer any turning back.
That is the point that must be reached.
                -- F. Kafka
2 visitors online now
1 guests, 1 members
Max visitors today: 5 at 02:23 am EDT
This month: 30 at 05-19-2012 03:55 am EDT
This year: 30 at 05-19-2012 03:55 am EDT
All time: 107 at 01-31-2011 07:26 pm EST